Medium-format powerhouse Fujifilm GFX100RF faces a challenge from the APS-C contender Fujifilm X100VI: can the compact camera upset the medium-format champion?

Medium-format powerhouse Fujifilm GFX100RF faces a challenge from the APS-C contender Fujifilm X100VI: can the compact camera upset the medium-format champion?

In the realm of photography, Fujifilm has released two intriguing cameras that cater to different segments: the compact X100VI and the impressively compact GFX100RF, boasting a medium-format sensor.

These cameras share a similar aesthetic, and each is a top-rated choice on our platform for travel or city photography, thanks to their fixed, relatively wide-angle lenses and compact bodies. However, the pricing and performance of each camera set them apart, making one a better fit for most photographers.

On your wallet's mayday call, listen up! The GFX100RF, with its pricier medium-format sensor, is a costly proposition at $4,899 / £4,699 / AU$8,799, whereas the X100VI is a more affordable option at $1,599 / £1,599 / AU$2,899.

Now, let's dive into the nitty-gritty differences between the two cameras.

Design-wise, both cameras gleam in Fujifilm's revered retro style in two-tone silver and black or all-black versions. Yet, the X100VI is more fitting of the classic blueprint, whereas the GFX100RF, with its larger sensor, appears a smidge uncommon to eyes accustomed to the series for over a decade. In terms of dimensions, the GFX100 RF measures 133.5 x 90.4x 76.5mm, weighing in at a hefty 735g, while the X100VI boasts a more svelte 128 x 74.8 x 55.3mm figure, tipping the scales at 521g. Neither camera is weather-sealed out of the box, but you can add that protection with an extra lens adaptor ring and filter.

Sensor and lens specifics elaborate the differences between these two contenders. The X100 series has long held APS-C sensors, while the GFX100 RF brings to the table a medium-format sensor, one class larger than full-frame. This disparity results in nearly four times the sensor area compared to the X100VI. Regarding sensor resolution, the GFX100RF outpaces the X100VI by a considerable margin (100MP versus 40MP), but maintains larger sensor pixels. The lenses are also markedly diverse, with the GFX100RF sporting a wider 28mm equivalent focal length.

This brings us to Image Quality, a key factor in every photography enthusiast's mind. While conventional wisdom might suggest a camera with a larger sensor would own the night, real-world experiences reveal a different story. In low light, the X100VI remains the go-to choice, due to its sensor-based IBIS rated at six stops of effectiveness, coupled with a wider maximum aperture. Conversely, the GFX100RF dominates in controlled conditions, thriving on a tripod or well-lit settings. It also holds the upper hand in terms of cropping flexibility, thanks to its ultra-high 100MP resolution.

In tests of Speed and buffer limits, the X100VI proves to be the faster performer, offering a burst shooting speed of up to 20fps with a 1.29x crop, while the GFX100RF maxes out at 6fps, irrespective of mode.

Lastly, when it comes to Video, the X100VI takes the reins with its 6K recording capability at 30fps and slow-motion capabilities up to 240fps at 1080p. The GFX100RF lags behind, with 4K recording limited to 30fps and no slow-mo options as good as the X100VI.

All in all, the Fujifilm X100VI prevails as an all-around flexible, lighter, and friendlier camera for travel and street photography, while the GFX100RF reigns supreme for its exceptional image quality and cropping flexibility in controlled, well-lit conditions.

Both cameras, the Fujifilm X100VI and the GFX100RF, belong to the realm of technology, showcasing advanced features in their design and functionality. The X100VI, with its sleeker build and lighter weight, is better suited for travel and street photography, while the GFX100RF, equipped with headphones-worthy audio capabilities and a high-resolution sensor, offers superior image quality and cropping flexibility in controlled, well-lit conditions.

Read also: