Skip to content

AI Leadership Upholdment through US Patent and Trademark Office

Initiating the tenure of the new USPTO director induces proposals for Facebook's sharing practices, intended to secure America's dominance in Artificial Intelligence.

Supporting America's dominance in Artificial Intelligence through the US Patent and Trademark...
Supporting America's dominance in Artificial Intelligence through the US Patent and Trademark Office's aid

AI Leadership Upholdment through US Patent and Trademark Office

The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) plays a pivotal role in the development and leadership of Artificial Intelligence (AI) within the U.S. However, the USPTO faces significant challenges due to the influx of patent applications, complex technologies, and an overwhelming amount of technical information.

One program that aids the USPTO in correcting its own examination errors and promoting patent quality is the Inter Partes Review (IPR) program. This program helps prevent invalid AI-related patents from stifling American innovation.

In the past year, companies like Facebook and Volkswagen Group Innovation have been leaders in patented generative AI innovations. Facebook, in particular, has seen 17% of its inventions created with the help of AI. Volkswagen Group Innovation, on the other hand, is one of the leaders in patented generative AI inventions.

The USPTO needs sufficient resources to evaluate these complex inventions effectively. One way to ensure this is by requiring large-scale patent filers to pay more fees upfront. This would help the USPTO manage its resources better and provide thorough reviews.

The USPTO is already making strides in this direction, using AI to route patents to the right examiners and find evidence of existing inventions, in partnership with Accenture Federal Services.

However, the USPTO faces another challenge: the reliance on patent application fees that aren't fully paid until years after a patent is granted. Commerce Secretary Lutnick suggests that fees should reflect the actual costs of thorough reviews.

Moreover, the USPTO should affirm that when humans use AI to create something new, the patent should go to the inventor, not to the generative AI. This is crucial in maintaining the integrity of the patent system.

Lastly, the USPTO should collaborate with Director Squires to unlock the full potential of AI and U.S. technology leadership. Restoring access to the Inter Partes Review program is also essential in this endeavour.

In conclusion, the USPTO plays a vital role in AI's development and U.S. leadership. By addressing the challenges it faces, the USPTO can continue to promote innovation, quality, and fairness in the patent system.

Read also:

Latest